PR: Sometimes it's better not to "control the narrative"

Can the company that made this motorcycle in 1921 teach you anything about media relations in this age of  media fragmentation?

Can the company that made this motorcycle in 1921 teach you anything about media relations in this age of media fragmentation?

Lately most of my work falls into one of two buckets: motorcycle journalism or corporate communications in the tech world. Last week, Italy’s Piaggio Group celebrated the 100th birthday of its Moto Guzzi brand. The way Piaggio handled the centenary provide an interesting lesson – and not just for motorcycle companies but in comms generally.

Moto Guzzi was incorporated on March 15, 1921. The normal PR approach would be to craft a tight press release, curate a few photos and try to control the story.

Piaggio indeed wrote a press release that skimmed the storied brands highlights. But then it sent journalists like me a link to a WeTransfer site with scores of historic photo, and video b-roll. Basically it invited journalists to find their own angles.

Of course some lazy web sites just regurgitated the press release and randomly grabbed a few photos. But the document dump enabled more enterprising writers to take a much deeper diver into Moto Guzzi history. They wrote more engaging, stickier stories.

Imagine my surprise when I opened the zip file and saw over a dozen directories, many of which had subdirectories. There are hundreds of files in here.

Imagine my surprise when I opened the zip file and saw over a dozen directories, many of which had subdirectories. There are hundreds of files in here.

I don’t know whether the decision to provide so much material – far, far more than journalists would usually get – was thought out or whether in the day-to-day chaos and COVID someone at Piaggio was just too rushed to curate photos and gave us all of them.

If it was thought out it was a stroke of genius. If the latter, it was a lucky accident other companies can learn from. Here’s why…

In the old days, PR around an event like the Moto Guzzi centenary would have been directed to a handful of big motorcycle magazines. Having Cycle World (which for a long time was the largest-circulation motorcycle rag) run the press release verbatim would be a PR win.

But Cycle World’s once-huge audience of enthusiasts is now fragmented amongst many, many web sites and blogs. People that would have read the magazine cover-to-cover once a month now skip across several websites while sipping their morning coffee. If those people see the same press release regurgitated or even hastily re-written, they’ll just think, “Oh I’ve already read this,” and scroll to the next story.

By giving up control of the narrative, Piaggio encouraged journalists to write a bunch of different stories, about whatever caught their eye in that massive document drop. The result was more – and more engaging – stories.

No matter what business you’re in, it’s tempting to try to control your narrative. I work with clients to help them frame stories for other journalists. But sometimes you should step back and admit that writers and editors probably know their audiences better than you do. Even if a journalist resists or ignores your story framing, rest assured they’ll always write a better story about something they find interesting.

Next time, try giving journalists more latitude.

At tip though: Piaggio provided almost no captioning information, except for dates and (usually) model names — in this case “Gambalughino” refers to this 250cc production racer. This jpg was also in another file, in which the rider was identified bu…

At tip though: Piaggio provided almost no captioning information, except for dates and (usually) model names — in this case “Gambalughino” refers to this 250cc production racer. This jpg was also in another file, in which the rider was identified but the year and machine were not. As a journalist, I love getting good photos that I can pass on to my editors, but I know they’ll ask, “Who, What, When, Where, and Why is this important?” Next time, help a bit-stained wretch out with the information needed to write informative captions.

A suggestion to redistrict by algorithm highlights AI’s PR problem  

AI has a PR problem.

AI has a PR problem.

The other day something popped up in my Twitter feed, related to “uncapping” the House of Representatives. This could mean increasing the number of Congresspeople to as many as 1,000 from the current 435.

The way districts are currently apportioned means that there’s a wide variance in the number of citizens per representative (In theory Montana’s sole representative looks out for the interests of nearly twice as many citizens as the rep from Rhode Island’s First District.) That seems unfair on its face, but one argument cited for uncapping the House was that having far more districts would reduce the impact of gerrymandering.

I’m not sure that’s mathematically true. Most models that are used to explain gerrymandering illustrate it with a dozen or so data points (i.e., voters). I don’t see how merely reducing the number of voters per district will inherently make gerrymanders less effective. If anything, redistricting every single district would favor whatever party is most skilled at this odious practice. And who would draw the new boundaries? Parties in power in each state? Even “bipartisan commissions” bring different degrees of partisanship to the (mapping) table.

As is my wont, I Tweeted my two cents-worth, arguing that rather than push for two huge changes–changing the number of representatives and redrawing every district–effort would be better spent by using an AI algorithm to take politics out of district maps .

For the purposes of illustration, I outlined an admittedly simplistic district-mapping algorithm:

1.     Divide each state’s population by the number of districts, to get a target number of residents/district. (This is supposed to be the first step in any redistricting exercise so it shouldn’t be controversial.)

2.     Use Census data to map every state’s residents by their place-of-residence. (Again, should be SOP.)

3.     Map the total number of residents into districts such that the total length of district boundary is minimized. This would obviously be fiendishly difficult for a human mapmaker, but easy for a supercomputer.

Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, the Dakotas, Vermont, and Delaware are one-district states so there’d be no changes in those places. In putting such an algorithm into practice in every other state, we might decide to exclude those district boundaries that were also state borders. We might allow the algorithm to have some flexibility in apportioning residents to districts; giving it a +/- 1,000 residents if doing so would significantly reduce the total district boundary length. Such a system would certainly create some capricious boundaries. For example it would not treat any neighborhood as cohesive; it would disregard natural borders such as rivers. However the existing gerrymandered boundaries are preposterous.

To be clear: I’m not suggesting that this would be the redistricting algorithm. It’s just an example of a possible algorithm that is apolitical by definition; it doesn’t take into account party affiliations, voting patterns, or demographic data that could be used to infer voting/party preferences.

I explained all this to get this point in this post: Considering the relatively small number of Twitter followers I have, the response to this suggestion was pretty vitriolic and it all focused on accusations that AI is inherently political.

Vis-à-vis my specific example, some people may argue that the Census data itself is political. (The GOP has tried to undercount people who are inclined to vote Democratic.) But the Census and its status as the basis for apportioning representation is written into the Constitution. For my purposes, it’s a given. 

Taking political advantage out of the districting process–creating district maps based merely on geospatial population data without regard for voting history or demographics–would neutralize existing gerrymanders and as such would have a political impact but such an algorithm is not political in and of itself. (If anything it is far closer to the the framers’ intent than what we currently do.) 

Particularly effective gerrymandering as seen for example in my new home state of Wisconsin also has the effect of turning primaries into the only elections that matter, thus increasing candidates’ extremism. So a politically blind algorithm would have the additional political impact of reducing the appeal of fundamentalists in both parties. But having a political impact doesn’t mean the algorithm itself is necessarily political.

I’ve read compelling stories of facial recognition software that is far less accurate when it comes to identifying black and brown people than when identifying Caucasians. It’s obviously possible that the people who create AI algorithms accidentally write code that mimics their own (often unconscious) prejudices. So I agree that AI can be “political”.

And maybe that kind of built-in prejudice is more insidious because since it come from (through?) a machine we might be inclined to treat it as dispassionate in the same way that juries often wrongly feel that DNA evidence is impartial. (DNA’s impartial, the way we frame DNA evidence is definitely not.)

But the idea that “all AI is political” just because people wrote the code or just because it affects people seems like a ridiculous bit of naysaying considering that the alternative to artificial intelligence is human intelligence, and that definitely comes with full complement of human prejudices.

The willingness of people in my Twitter feed to immediate discount any AI solution as “political” should be alarming to people working in AI.

The Trump you know was created by “The apprentice”. But trumpism would never have happened without the wga strikes.

“What you’re seeing and hearing is not what’s happening.”—Donald Trump, 2018

“The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”—George Orwell, “1984”

Much has been written about the way reality television producer Roger Burnett and television executive Jeff Zucker created the myth of Donald Trump as a successful billionaire executive from whole cloth early in Trump’s 14 year run as star of NBC’s The Apprentice franchise.

Absent Burnett and Zucker, Trump would be a footnote in American politics at most. It’s unlikely that he would have entered the Republican primary race in 2016 and inconceivable that he would have won the nomination.

But there’s more to Trumpism than Trump. Trump’s a fluke, Trumpism was was inevitable (although of course it would have appeared under some other name.)

Voltaire said, “If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him.” If Trump did not exist, the GOP would have created someone like him.

Trump’s rise — his ability to capture attention — depended on the image Burnett and Zucker crafted for a multiply bankrupt drug addict, serial sex predator and general charlatan. But Trump’s rule and his ability to retain his audience hinge on an additional factor: A substantial minority of Americans are now completely untethered from reality. People still bemoaning Trump’s 20,000+ lies in office don’t get it; we’re living in the post-truth era.

I blame the Writer’s Guild of America. 

Truth died the death of 1,000 cuts but one of the deepest was accidental; an unintended consequence of the 2007-’08 Hollywood writer’s strike. The WGA strike was less than four months long; from early November until late February. But it brought scripted TV to a grinding halt. With both sides entrenched, networks scrambled to greenlight content that was not subject to the WGA agreement.

“Unscripted” shows, such as game shows and Reality TV weren’t written by WGA members. Although there were quite a few Reality shows on the air before the strike, dozens of new ones premiered in 2008. As the genre grew, shows found themselves competing amongst each other for audience share. Conflict between flamboyant, larger-than-life characters got better ratings. In order to ensure that’s what cameras captured, producers crafted storylines that were less and less believable.

Millions of gullible Americans spent every night night watching D-list celebrities (often with the implants to match) act out ridiculous scenarios that were presented as The Real World. No wonder Trump lies so shamelessly. For his supporters questions like, “Is that true?” or “Could that really have happened?” are just a buzzkill.

Fox News was also emboldened by the realization that its audience watched Fox shows like Joe Millionaire (in which single ladies competed for the attentions of a millionaire) and believed they were watching real things that happened. By the time it emerged that “Joe Millionaire” was a freelance underwear model, the audience had moved on to some other nightly bit of voyeurism.

Unfortunately for real screenwriters, by the time the WGA came to an agreement with the studios, the studios and networks had realized that Reality TV was cheaper to produce and more profitable than scripted drama.

To be clear, The Apprentice and Donald Trump weren’t created by the WGA strike – The Apprentice first aired in 2004. But Trump’s status changed dramatically when Reality TV flooded the networks in the wake of the strike. When Mark Burnett initially pitched The Apprentice, Trump was unimpressed; he told Burnett, “Reality TV is for society’s bottom-feeders.” He was right; before the strike, Trump was a star in the medium’s least-respected genre. But after the strike, Reality TV took over the medium; Trump became a TV star, period.

My own brief flirtations with writing for Reality TV were eye opening

I once pitched a dance-themed Reality TV show and was shut down because the “talent” wasn’t obnoxious enough. “If you can’t stand to be a room with them for more than half an hour,” a producer told me, “they’re about right.”

Later, I worked on a show about motorcycling. A producer and friend asked me to script a pilot episode that opened with the talent getting a speeding ticket. He told me to write the cop’s dialog.

“Do you think we’re going to find a cop who can act?” I asked.

The producer shrugged and said, “We’ll just toss him the lines from off camera until he gets it right.”

Mark Burnett & Jeff Zucker created Donald Trump, but the death of truth enabled him

Those guys created the Donald Trump character, tossing him lines from off-camera.

No one had to untether Trump himself from reality; he’s a compulsive liar. But a big reason millions of people swallow his obvious lies is that they’ve been conditioned to believe the equally obvious fabrications and fictions of Reality TV.  Watching real fiction – say, The Wire – would never have that effect because it’s presented as fiction. Watching Cops did have that effect, because it was presented as reality.

“Wait a minute!” you might protest. “Cops first aired on Fox way back in 1989.”

Yep. Right after the 1988 WGA strike.

In a Venn diagram, the circle denoting the set Bigfoot believers is entirely contained within the circle denoting the set Trump supporters.

In a Venn diagram, the circle denoting the set Bigfoot believers is entirely contained within the circle denoting the set Trump supporters.

Accidental Brand Messages

Last week I left my aging MacBook Air laptop on an airplane. Argh.

As I’m traveling again next week, I needed to quickly replace it. Realistically when on the road, all I need is something I can run Word on, and use to access the Web. For those minimal purposes, there are PC laptops that sell for a fraction of what even a used MacBook costs. So in a moment of weakness, I bought a 14” HP laptop from Best Buy for $220, including free next-day delivery.

Since I bought it specifically as a travel computer, I immediately needed a travel adapter that I could use in Europe.

This kit is available in any Apple store. With it, you can plug your Apple computer into just about any wall socket, anywhere in the world. Apple seems to be telling it’s customers, “You’re really going places.”

This kit is available in any Apple store. With it, you can plug your Apple computer into just about any wall socket, anywhere in the world. Apple seems to be telling it’s customers, “You’re really going places.”

That’s where things got frustrating. As an Apple user, I could (and did) walk into any Apple store and buy a little kit, with plugs that adapt the Apple power converter for wall sockets anywhere in the world. I was sure that HP would offer something similar.

Wrong. HP.com does in fact offer a travel converter with just such a removable plug. But in the United States, HP sells that converter with an American plug only.

HP.com sells a travel power adapter, but in the U.S. you can only buy it with the U.S.-spec plug shown. There is no provision anywhere on HP.com or indeed from Hewlett-Packard in the U.S. at all, to plug the company’s products in, in a foreign count…

HP.com sells a travel power adapter, but in the U.S. you can only buy it with the U.S.-spec plug shown. There is no provision anywhere on HP.com or indeed from Hewlett-Packard in the U.S. at all, to plug the company’s products in, in a foreign country. The message here is that the kind of people who’d buy an HP computer aren’t going far. HP probably didn’t realize that by stocking this lame product it was making a brand statement, but brand is the sum total of every touchpoint.

Think about that. HP sells a travel converter, but only for travel within North America. To places where the power cord supplied with the computer also works fine.

I spent a full hour* on in ‘chat’ with someone at HP explaining that I needed to plug it in, in Europe, not in the U.S. I explained that several HP parts would work, for example the travel converter that they sell in Europe comes with a European plug. For that matter, the standard power cord sold with any HP laptop in Europe would serve. None of those parts are available in the U.S. She suggested that I just buy one in Europe.

In the end, I had to leave it here (this is excerpted from the chat transcript HP emailed me at the conclusion of the chat.)

Mark Gardiner: "Every HP laptop sold in Europe is sold with a power cord that plugs into European wall sockets. I just need one of those."

Agent (Blanca): "I understand that, I highly suggest that you will purchase the power adapter once you arrived to Europe. I have checked all the information but giving me the same details."

Agent (Blanca): "I'm happy for you, will you be travelling together with your family?"

Mark Gardiner: "That is ridiculous advice. I'm not moving to Europe, I'm going on a business trip. I won't have time to find a power cord. Totally unsatisfactory non-resolution of my problem."

Mark Gardiner: "Apple sells a simple kit for their products"

Agent (Blanca): "I know that I was not able to fully resolve your issue today but I am hoping you were still satisfied with the answers that I am giving you."

After giving up, I was struck by the accidental brand message sent by HP.

Apple, by making a global travel kit available in every store is basically saying, “You’re going places. The world is your oyster.”

HP, by selling an America-only “travel converter” is saying, we make computers for people going nowhere, fast.

*It didn’t just feel like an hour. It was 1:07 according to the time stamps on the transcript.

Is your web site's Contact Form a digital ‘Walk’ button?

Years ago I read that 75% of the ‘walk’ buttons in NYC weren’t even connected. They existed only to make pedestrians think they had some control over their wait. How much better is your web site’s contact form?

Years ago I read that 75% of the ‘walk’ buttons in NYC weren’t even connected. They existed only to make pedestrians think they had some control over their wait. How much better is your web site’s contact form?

A few weeks ago, I wrote a story for the New York Times about pop star Katy Perry and her just-released song, ‘Harleys in Hawaii’.

The focus of my story was just how much of a gift was the song, and its associated music video, to Harley-Davidson?Clearly, Christmas came early to Milwaukee, because in the first couple of weeks after its release, the song was streamed about 20 million times, and the YouTube video was viewed something like 12 million times. Perry, who has on the order of 100 million followers on social media, also put up dozens of Tweets and IG posts relating to it.

Since I wanted to put a value on that engagement, I made a list of three top specialist agencies in the ‘influencer marketing’ space and approached them using their web site Contact forms.

The three specialists I approached were Obviously, Kairos Media, and Viral Nation. To those I added a powerhouse digital agency from my hometown of Kansas City: VMLY&R.

So, four agencies in total. every subject line was the same…

Journalist enquiry: New York Times

Every company also got exactly the same text delivered in the message body, asking an executive to provide a ballpark estimate for a very large-scale social media engagement by a pop star with a very large following. If they were interested I’d forward specifics. I made it clear I was only looking for a ballpark estimate and an executive’s top-line impression. Something that would take half an hour of an assistant’s time, and ten minutes from an exec.

VMLY&R could have provided someone, to be cited as an expert in a hot marketing area, in a feature story in the New York Times. But it simply never responded at all. Not even a “No thanks,” or “Sorry but we’re swamped.”

At the other end of the spectrum, Obviously must have an employee that gets a push notification when a Contact’s initiated. They got back to me within two minutes. The gist of their response was, Sure, we’d love to comment, can you give us more information?

In between those extremes, fell Kairos and Viral Nation. Someone at Kairos wrote back to say, We Googled your name; you’ve written some cool stories, how can we help you? Someone at Viral Nation wrote to ask, Can you provide samples of your work in the Times? TBH, that felt a little snarky, and I gave them a snippy response to the effect of, “Try entering my name in the search bar on NYTimes.com.”

Years ago I read a story somewhere about walk buttons at crosswalks in New York City. Someone at the city admitted that 75% of them weren’t even connected. They existed only to give pedestrians something to do while they waited for the walking man to light up. Some firms’ Contact Forms give me the very same impression.

Of the three companies that responded to my Contact requests, Obviously responded quickest, and with an immediate 'Yes’. CEO Mae Karwowski was also the most engaged and engaging person I spoke to. If I had been a potential customer looking for an in…

Of the three companies that responded to my Contact requests, Obviously responded quickest, and with an immediate 'Yes’. CEO Mae Karwowski was also the most engaged and engaging person I spoke to. If I had been a potential customer looking for an influencer marketing agency, instead of a journalist, my choice would have been easy.

A prompt, cheerful, and above all human response to Contact forms is a critical part of your brand’s Customer Experience.

When a company like VMLY&R just doesn’t respond – or like Viral Media issues a response that’s vaguely off-putting – it’s not even as good as a disconnected Walk button. I mean, eventually, the pedestrian will get where they’re going. But if you don’t respond to that Contact request the customer will, well, just walk. And, quite possibly walk away with a negative opinion about your company as well.

In the case of my story for the Times, I eventually spoke to the CEOs of Obviously, Kairos, and Viral. They provided wildly divergent estimates of the value of Katy Perry’s song to Harley-Davidson, which certainly suggests that the whole ‘influencer’ branch of marketing is still far from an exact science.

I expected that. But one thing that caught my attention was, when I ranked each CEO’s degree of engagement and enthusiasm, as well as the amount and quality of insight provided – that ranking was precisely the same as the ranking of their initial responsiveness to my initial contact.

If I’d been a potential client looking for an agency in that space, my decision would have been easy. Maybe I could have made my choice before even speaking to them, based on the quality of that initial response.

20 years ago in advertising

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s leading newspaper. This story, by reporter John Heinzl, describes one of my Canadian ad career’s more memorable projects. Soon after, I moved to Kansas City to work for Muller & Associates (now Muller Bressler Brow…

The Globe and Mail is Canada’s leading newspaper. This story, by reporter John Heinzl, describes one of my Canadian ad career’s more memorable projects. Soon after, I moved to Kansas City to work for Muller & Associates (now Muller Bressler Brown). Yes, that’s me. I sure wish I still had those glasses.

From The Globe and Mail’s Report on Business, June 7 1999…

THE TELECOM FORMERLY KNOWN AS ATLANTICCO ISSUED A CHALLENGE – CREATE A NEW MONIKER FOR THE COMPANY THAT YOUNG PEOPLE WOULD DIG, CAN WORK IN TWO LANGUAGES AND DOESN’T CONTAIN ‘TEL’. AD SHOP SGCI ACCEPTED – THEN THE CRAZINESS BEGAN.

At 3:40 p.m. on April 5, an unusual fax arrived at SGCI Communications Inc., an advertising agency in tiny Sackville, N.B. It was from Atlantic Canada’s newly merged telecommunication company, temporarily dubbed AtlanticCo.

We need help finding a permanent name, the fax said. Here are the rules: It must consist of one word with no more than three syllables; work in both of Canada’s official languages; connote qualities such as “innovative,” young,” and “nimble;” be gender neutral; and because telecommunications isn’t our only business, the name absolutely cannot contain “tel.”

By the way, we’re kind of in a hurry. You have three days.

Three days? Normally, developing a name can take three months. The same fax was sent to four other agencies, setting in motion of of the most bizarre competitions in Canadian advertising, culminating last week with the launch of the new name, Aliant Inc., in a splashy ad campaign. If finding the new name seemed hurried, developing the campaign was enough to drive anyone silly.

“It was,” says Mark Gardiner, creative director at SCGC, “insane.”

We were looking for and agency that was quick and nimble, and that’s certainly where SGCI nailed it

AtlanticCo, a company with $1.7 billion in revenue, had to move quickly indeed. Formed in March by the merger of Atlantic Canada’s four telephone companies, it needed to have its new name and logo in place well before June 1, the day its shares would begin trading. The name would appear not only in the ad campaign but in stock tables, on share certificates and umpteen other places.

On the afternoon the fax arrived at SGCI, Mr. Gardiner briefed the 10 employees in his creative department. He then dispatched someone to find a lawyer who could do trademark searches (finding a name that isn’t already taken can be a challenge, as AtlanticCo would later discover).

The next day, SGCI’s creative team met twice to toss around potential names. They assembled a list of 75 candidates, including such clunkers as Semaphore, Lucca, Celeritas, Neptune and Vivim. Vivim? “I don’t know, Vivim sounds like something you’d clean your windows with,” Mr. Gardiner admits.

After weeding out out those dogs and others, SGCI sent a list of six serious contenders – Azimuth, Avantix, Langis, Imago, Aria, Prospera – to AtlanticCo and waited for a response. Several days went by. Nothing. Then on April 12, another fax arrived from AtlanticCo.

We don’t like any of your names, it said, but would you be interested in developing a logo and ad campaign around four names that were submitted by other agencies? (Those names were Forlantic, Elantos, Alterra, and Aliant.) We’ll need a complete presentation, the fax said, with details about your proposed campaign, the media strategy, public relations plan, etc., and you’ll be competing against other agencies, of course, at your own expense.

By the way, the presentations are St. John’s. In three days.

Huh? SGCI was tempted to say thanks, but no thanks. Mounting a major pitch in such a short time would be both expensive and disruptive, particularly for a 45-person agency. Besides, being the smallest of those invited, it considered itself a dark horse, particularly after its names were rejected.

AtlanticCo didn’t really consider SGCI a serious contender, either. “To be honest with you... we invited them almost out of courtesy,” says Mark Lever, a Halifax marketing consultant who was  brought in by AtlanticCo to lead the agency selection process.

Despite the steep odds, SGCI deiced to jump in. The main reason: One of its biggest clients is New Brunswick Telephone Co. Ltd., a partner in the AtlanicCo merger. By not participating, SGCI would have sent the wrong signal to N.B. Tel.

“Once we decide to do this, we said, ‘All right, let’s not panic,” Mr. Gardiner says. Account people cleared their calendars of appointments. Employees called their spouses to say they’d be home late, if at all. And virtually everyone pitched in to meet what seemed like an impossible deadline.

With the clock ticking, each of SGCI’s four art directors was given a different company name and told to design a logo, along with sample business cards and letterhead for each one. They also developed sample brochures, newspaper and Internet ads for some of the names.

The agency’s media department worked to prepare a sample plan outlining where the proposed ads would appear and how much they would cost. Meanwhile, Doug Simpson, the SGCI partner in charge of client services, put together a roughly 50-page document laying out he entire communications strategy.

On the morning of the pitch, Mr. Gardiner, Mr. Simpson and an account executive flew from Moncton to Halifax and on to St. John’s. The flight featured some tense moments. Two competing agencies from Halfiax – Bristol Group, Inc. and Corporate Communications, Ltd. – were said to be on board too, so SGCI officials couldn’t discuss their pitch with each other. Mr. Gardiner says he was too afraid to even study his notes lest someone peer over his shoulder.

When all three agencies were finished pitching – two others that participated in the name contest had by now dropped out – the SGCI team waited at a house in St. John’s owned by an SGCI employee. They were called back to AtlanticCo’s office, expecting a second round of presentations. That’s when they were told the good news: They had already won.

If the naming contest seemed hurried, developing the campaign was enough to drive anyone around the bend

“We were looking for an agency that was quick and nimble, that’s certainly where SGCI nailed it,” Mr Lever says. “They didn’t miss a lick.”

For SGCI, the craziness was just starting however. Having won the pitch, it now had to scramble to put the campaign into play. But there was surprise around the corner that nobody had foreseen.

Of the four names submitted, AtlanticCo was most fond of Aliant. (It, in fact, wasn’t one of the names originally submitted; Corporate Communications had proposed Alient, but people weren’t sure how to pronounce it, and some thought it looked too much like Alien, so it was changed.)

Problem was, a Nebraska telecommunications company was already using the name Aliant, a crucial fact that had been missed, for whatever reason, in the earlyt legal searches. So, as June 1 loomed, SGCI had to generate  a list of alternate names. (These weren’t much better than their earlier efforts. A sample: Marix, Portis, and Pharos.) Luckily, it did not need any of them. The Nebraska-based Aliant, which is in the process of being taken over by another company and will soon change its name, agreed to sell the right to the moniker to AtlanticCo for about $50,000, sources say.

With a name finally in hand, SGCI began to prepare for the launch. Wanting to reach investors on Bay Street, it bought two-page spreads in the The Globe and and Mail and National Post that looked like actual stock tables. The ads bade “farewell” to the four regional telecoms and “hello” to Aliant, announcing the new name, Web site (www.aliant.ca) and the stock symbol (AIT). Different two-page ads ran in 14 dailies in Atlantic Canada, in both French and English.

The launch, which had an estimated budget of $500,000, included other elements such as Internet banner ads, a video that was shown to employees from the four companies, and a 12-page brochure that workers could take home.

After putting in five straight 90-hour weeks, you’d think Mr. Gardiner would be ready for a holiday. But last week, he tackled yet another supremely daunting task: cleaning up the mountain of paper that was threatening to bury his desk.

Jiffy Lube just changed my oil. Did they just change a policy, too?

Although the staff at my local Jiffy Lube have always been competent and friendly, I never thought I’d have the occasion to blog about them. But today, they didn’t just change my oil, they changed my attitude towards Jiffy Lube.

Although the staff at my local Jiffy Lube have always been competent and friendly, I never thought I’d have the occasion to blog about them. But today, they didn’t just change my oil, they changed my attitude towards Jiffy Lube.

I’m frugal, I admit. I drive a 15 year-old Ford Focus, and will do so until it stops being a perfectly functional car. Part of keeping it functional is providing it with regular oil changes. I could change it myself, but I’m not that frugal.

For the last couple of months, I’ve been increasingly aware that my car was due for a change, and that meant dropping by my neighborhood Jiffy Lube. For years, I’ve been getting intermittent oil changes there. I’ve never had a complaint about the actual service.

It’s on a common route for me, and right across the street from a Costco that I shop at every week, so I’ve had dozens of chances to drop in, and felt a little more guilt every time as my car’s mileage accumulated.

What held me back? Just this…

Every time I’ve gone, they always pump me for any number of upcharges. I’ve got a high-mileage engine; do I want a more expensive oil blended (or least, labeled) for that purpose? Winter’s coming; do I want my radiator flushed? Tires rotated? Brake fluid topped up, or even battery electrolyte? They were always nice about it, but it still felt like a baby version of that passive-aggressive series of insurance questions you get when renting a car. (“Sign here to indicate that you will pay for the manager’s massages during the time your rental car is out of service in the event of damage.”)

No, no, no, no, no. I understand that those extras increase Jiffy Lube’s profit margin when suckers – oops, I mean ‘customers’ – opt for them. But I know what I want, which is a generic oil change, and that’s what I’ll get even if I have to push back all the way. I often wondered if the staff were being bonused on the basis of the number of times they succeeded in adding an upcharge.

Until today

Today, a kid scanned my car’s VIN, entered it into the shop’s computer, and saw that all I’ve ever bought was a basic oil change. He asked me if that’s what I wanted again.

Yes, I said.

He ushered me into the little waiting room, and ten minutes later he came in, and called me up to the counter. Here we go, I thought. 20 questions.

But all he said was, “$52.11”

I was taken aback. In a good way. I actually asked the kid, Did you not ask me about upcharges because you could see in your system that all I ever want is the basic oil change?

Yes, he said.

Would you have offered me all that stuff if I was a new customer?

Yes, he said again, adding, “We just don’t think we should waste your time if we know you don’t want any of it.”

I don’t know if that’s something that’s changed in the one shop I frequent, or if it’s a corporate policy. But either way there’s a huge lesson in this for other marketers. It was way, way less stressful than I expected. Did they pocket any extra margin on special oil my car doesn’t need? No, but they weren’t going to get that out of me, anyway.

The thing is, I’ll almost certainly get oil changes a little more frequently now that I know I am not going to have the added stress in the actual transaction.

As motorcycle industry sales have faltered, MotoCorsa's cultural brand has flourished

If every motorcycle dealership built its retail brand the way Arun Sharma built MotoCorsa’s, how many more people would ride motorcycles?

Every November during its global dealer conference, Ducati presents an award to the highest-volume dealer in every region. This past November, the top U.S. dealer was MotoCorsa, in Portland, Oregon.

In 2018, MotoCorsa won top new-bike sales honors for the sixth time. In sports terms, it’s like the Edmonton Oilers back in the Wayne Gretzky days. Except to extend that analogy, it’s 1989 and Gretzky’s now playing in Los Angeles. (L-R Tyler Dollard…

In 2018, MotoCorsa won top new-bike sales honors for the sixth time. In sports terms, it’s like the Edmonton Oilers back in the Wayne Gretzky days. Except to extend that analogy, it’s 1989 and Gretzky’s now playing in Los Angeles. (L-R Tyler Dollard, Regional Business Manager, Ducati North America; Jamie Rucklos, General Manager, MotoCorsa; Kris O’Hare, National Sales Director, DNA; Jason Wilson, General Sales Manager, MotoCorsa; Jason Chinnock, CEO, DNA.)

MotoCorsa again. I guess winning for the sixth time proves their previous five wins weren’t flukes.

The first time I heard about MotoCorsa, it gave me pause. If the top-grossing dealership was in New York or LA, I’d think, Well of course. But Portland? There’s any number of bigger, richer markets.

This man has been the best Ducati dealer ever.I’m serious.He’s not.

This man has been the best Ducati dealer ever.

I’m serious.

He’s not.

To understand MotoCorsa, you need to get to know Arun Sharma – although he no longer works there, everyone agrees that he’s the guy who created the dealership’s unique culture and retail brand.

Motorcycles aren’t exactly the Sharma family business; Arun’s mom & dad, and his sister, are all college professors. He was an English major who left Wisconsin on a long and winding motorcycle journey – that ended with a Life-flight to a hospital in Mesa, Arizona. He took that as a sign Arizona was not for him. A friend suggested Portand.

After working a few low-level retail jobs, Arun settled into an art shop where he worked as a framer. “I ended up in sales, and in the late ’90s I started an online business called TheArtBroker.com,” he told me. “It was great. I was living the life of Reilly in a cool apartment in downtown Portland but I worked by myself. I decided that I needed another job around other people.”

While Arun was sitting around in his underwear, selling art online, Ducati came back to Portland. A successful regional auto dealer group, Ron Tonkin Dealerships, started selling Ducs out of an existing Ferrari dealership. When Arun heard that Tonkin was about to move the Ducati franchise to a stand-alone store near Nike’s headquarters in the suburb of Beaverton, he applied for a part-time sales job.

“Of course the GM’s first question was, ‘Had I ever worked in a bike shop?’” Arun recalled. “When I said no, his second question was, ‘Then how are you going to sell Ducatis?’ I told him that I sold fine art and rode a Ducati, and that I’d figure it out.”

The new shop was staffed like a car dealership. “The sales manager was a guy from a big multi-line store. He would just stand there with his hands on his hips while I talked to a customer. He’d take me aside and ask, ‘Are they buying?’” Arun recalled. “I’d say, No, they’re just looking, and he’d say, ‘Don’t waste your time talking to them, go find someone who’s buying a bike today.’”

Sharma sometimes ran out of the shop, to catch customers as they left so he could apologize for the shitty customer experience they’d just had. When that got old, he decided to quit, but he wanted to hand his resignation to the owner, Brad Tonkin. When Tonkin asked why Arun was leaving, he spoke from the heart.

“When you sell a brand like Ducati, you’re a steward of that brand,” Arun told him. “It’s not a widget; it’s almost a member of the family.”

You can guess where this story’s going: Tonkin offered to let Arun run the shop. In case you think it was all sunshine and lollipops from then on, however, you should know that Sharma summarily fired almost the entire staff. (Only the shop’s best tech was spared, because he had a great attitude and also, I suspect, because Arun realized he had to keep the service department ticking over.)

He re-staffed the shop in his own image, hiring a bunch of young guys (and gals) who all loved bikes. They may not have had much experience, but Arun told them, “All the times you’ve said, ‘Wouldn’t it be cool if?..’ Well, now we can do those things.” 

“I really wanted to curate a community,” Arun told me. “It wasn’t, ‘What are you going to buy today?’ I just wanted to make you feel comfortable and welcome. It was like ‘Cheers’ for motorcycles – a place where everyone knew your name. 

In the mid-2000s, Sharma went back to his boss, Brad Tonkin, and convinced him that MotoCorsa had outgrown its suburban location. Arun was sure that it would do better in an urban setting, and found the dealership’s current location – a 10,000 square-foot industrial building close to downtown Portland, in an area that was either hip or gritty depending on your point of view.

He hired Skylab Design, a highfalutin’ architecture firm that had never designed a motorcycle dealership; the company specialized in things like fancy boutique hotels. He told his architect that he wanted a retail setting that showcased motorcycles as if they were works of art. 

“I was hyper-involved, and I drove my staff crazy because I micro-managed them,” Sharma admitted. “People say I’m hard to work for. I’m an asshole, I have high standards; I wouldn’t want to work for me. But I had a very particular vision and to deliver it, I had to start with people who got it.”

When I asked what ‘getting it’ meant, Arun answered from a customer’s perspective. “The short answer is, you walk into the shop and you meet someone, or more than one person, and when you walk out you’ve made new friends.”

He continued, “Beyond that, the world’s a big and daunting place. So if you’re going to do something, it’s really nice to have someone who makes you think, ‘That’s my guy!’ – someone who is going to do what’s best for you, not what’s best for him.”

“Over the years, I got in regular fights with my sales staff, because they would want to sell someone the wrong bike. I wouldn’t sell a new rider a bike that was way out of their league. My salesmen would say, ‘They’re just going to go and buy one somewhere else.’ Well, too bad; I can only control what I can control.”

So ‘getting it’, in Arun’s vision, is the oldest trick in marketing. ‘It’ is making customers believe that you are their friend. And the way you do that is, you actually become their friend. Remember that hands-on-hips sales manager who asked whether the customer was going to buy today? Arun was happy to chat about motorbikes with customers who came in every few weeks for years – years! – before purchasing.

That’s a radical difference from most motorcycle dealerships, which operate on the principle that in every transaction there’s a winner and a loser; the Sales Manager’s job is run up the score on that loser customer 

For years, motorcycle dealers have been fighting for a bigger slice of a shrinking pie, and the double-your-profit, control-the-sale mindset has resulted in most dealerships providing customer experiences that alienate all but the most determined buyers.

So far, I’ve been describing MotoCorsa’s growth in the early 2000s, when the whole motorcycle industry was booming. That all changed at the beginning of the 2008 model year, when U.S. motorcycle sales dropped by half.

“One thing I’ve always believed is that motorcycles are your escape from the real world,” Arun told me. “People buy motorcycles to meditate, to turn off, to light up from the inside. To get away from the bullshit. In 2008, when the crash happened I said, ‘Here’s what we’re going to do: Everyone’s going through shit, so when they walk through our doors, we’re going to make them forget all about it. Never mention money or the economy; we’re only going to talk about motorcycles and fun.’ In June of 2008 we sold 61 motorcycles and broke a record for Ducati North America.

Jason Wilson is MotoCorsa’s sales manager. He’s been with the shop for nine years, over which time he’s seen the rise of online comparison shopping.

“Nowadays, I definitely see customers fewer times before they purchase,” he told me, “because they’ve done so much research online.” Customers who comparison shop online can trigger a race to the bottom among retailers, but MotoCorsa’s mitigated that trend by maintaining a large fleet of bikes with a liberal demo-ride policy – after all you can’t take a test ride online. Even more important, they’ve created a sense of community.

“It’s no accident,” Wilson told me, “that we have a disco ball in the showroom. We throw parties and they’re not necessarily even motorcycle focused. They’re just for fun – these are our friends; we’ve made friends by selling them bikes, but that’s not the only thing they do. Obviously we have the conventional sales – Black Friday or whatever – but at the end of the day it’s those extra touch points that make the difference, and most dealers just don’t do those things.”

When it come to bricks-and-mortar retail, the Internet taketh away, but it giveth, too. MotoCorsa’s been a savvy – often disarmingly offbeat – user of social media

A few years ago, Ducati released a typically sexist set of ‘wallpapers’, of scantily clad women draped over an 1199 Panigale. MotoCorsa responded with a calendar of its own male staffers. I’d describe them as cross-dressers but some were hardly dressed at all.

MotoCorsa’s ‘Manigale’ calendar spoof was full of photos that you may wish to unsee, but it was a global viral hit.

MotoCorsa’s ‘Manigale’ calendar spoof was full of photos that you may wish to unsee, but it was a global viral hit.

Images from the dealership’s famous ‘Red Room’ have also been shared countless times on customers’ own social media accounts. Every time a new bike’s sold, the customer takes possession in a dramatically lit, red-walled alcove. The Red Room is one of the best-known aspects of the MotoCorsa brand; customers travel from other states – often passing rival Ducati dealers en route – in order to literally have their moment in the spotlight.

Graham Beattie, a salesman, used to work at a BMW dealership. “They used to complain that I was too honest,” he told me. “Now that I work here, my wife tells me that she’s never seen me so happy to go into work.”

Graham Beattie, a salesman, used to work at a BMW dealership. “They used to complain that I was too honest,” he told me. “Now that I work here, my wife tells me that she’s never seen me so happy to go into work.”

The whole moto industry would be healthier if there were more dealerships like MotoCorsa

Over the last decade, the motorcycle industry has suffered and searched its soul. There are, to be sure, genuine headwinds out there: increasing income disparity; young people coming of age in the era of Uber – kids these days can’t even be bothered to get a driver’s license. Still, a lot of the moto industry’s post-recession problems were self-inflicted.

OEMs are finally aligning product offerings with market needs; there are more affordable and approachable new models on showroom floors. The next hurdle for the industry is improving the customer experience. To be clear, I’m not saying MotoCorsa is unique; there are other great dealers. But there are more bad ones than good ones, especially when it comes to being approachable and sharing enthusiasm for motorcycles with customers who don’t yet ride.

The culture that Arun created at MotoCorsa sells motorcycles. More importantly, it sells the idea of motorcycling.

The challenge for new GM Jamie Rucklos will be to preserve the shop’s unique personality.

The challenge for new GM Jamie Rucklos will be to preserve the shop’s unique personality.

Under new management

In 2014, Sharma’s career went full circle when he assumed the management of the Tonkin group’s Ferrari dealership. For a while, he tried to manage the Ducati store remotely, spending just a day or two per week on site. But having the managers of the motorcycle store report to the GM of the car store hadn’t worked when Arun was a kid, and it didn’t work when he was the boss, either.

So this past summer, Jamie Rucklos took over MotoCorsa. As a former Regional Business Manager for Ducati North America, Rucklos knows as well as anyone how high the bar was set. When I asked him whether MotoCorsa’s success could be replicated by other dealers, he thought it could, but he acknowledged that most dealers probably wouldn’t apply the lessons.

“We don’t drive how society changes. You just have to adapt to it,” he said. “The dealers who adapt with more vision and less animosity are going to do better. The guy who says, ‘I can’t do demos because of insurance,’ or, ‘they’ll get wrecked...’ Well you know what? That guy’s not going to be around in five years; when the industry shrinks, he’s going to be part of the shrinkage.

Intellectually, I think Jamie gets it. “Arun and I are very like-minded,” He told me. “Everyone here is a part of this, and brings their personality to the brand. On social media we put up crazy, fun videos. People can see us and realize, It’s the opposite of my local dealer.”

In my time in the ad business, I tried to help some of my own clients preserve their cultures when a charismatic founder turned over the reins. This kind of leadership transition is fraught with peril – and that’s especially true when it’s a retail brand and an expression of the founder’s own personality. I hope that MotoCorsa continues to be managed with that ‘community’ vibe, and doesn’t just become another dealership – however well run it might be – because losing that quirky personality would be a loss to the whole Portland motorcycle scene.

Ferrari

After hanging out at the shop most of a day, I went down to interview Arun at his new job, in the Ferrari dealership. He ended a long chat with this story...

“When I was starting out, I used to call dealers for advice all the time. So it meant a lot to me when people started to call me. I had this friend who paid to have a video made promoting his dealership. It showed the outside of the building, and the bikes and helmets, the service center... and it was beautiful, with very high production value, but they shot it after hours.”

“I felt bad when my friend asked what I thought of his new video. I had to tell him it was terrible; he wasted his money. He said, ‘Why?’ And I told him, everyone has Ducatis, and Arais, and benches with tools. The thing that makes you stand out is you; it’s your staff and customers. So you don’t have to have a café, and you don’t have to have the real estate for a Red Room, but you do have to have a genuine experience. You can’t fake it, you have to want to make people happy and want to connect with people. If you don’t, then you are not in the right business.”

At that, I closed my notebook and turned off my voice memo app. The last thing I had to get was a photo of Arun with his copper-colored Ferrari FF, outside in front of the dealership. He positioned the car while I set up my camera, and I snapped a few photos. As I was packing up my camera, he hopped back into his car to park it properly, in a spot right beside my rented Kia.

The window slid down. “Hey Mark,” he asked me with a shit-eating grin, “Have you ever driven a Ferrari?”

Although managing a Ferrari dealership has to be seen as a step up, Arun was wistful about leaving MotoCorsa behind. “Almost without exception,” he told me, “every significant relationship in my life – whether a friendship, or a romance, or in busin…

Although managing a Ferrari dealership has to be seen as a step up, Arun was wistful about leaving MotoCorsa behind. “Almost without exception,” he told me, “every significant relationship in my life – whether a friendship, or a romance, or in business – is someone I met through motorcycles.”

Southwest proves my point with a splash of half-and-half

Hire the right people, empower them to make customers happy. This is the story of one tiny kindness strengthening the Southwest brand, for one customer. Staff like Carol, here, help to explain why among all U.S. carriers, only Delta has a larger mar…

Hire the right people, empower them to make customers happy. This is the story of one tiny kindness strengthening the Southwest brand, for one customer. Staff like Carol, here, help to explain why among all U.S. carriers, only Delta has a larger market capitalization than Southwest (and Delta’s fleet’s almost twice a big!)

Last month I found myself in a dilemma that’s common (for me). I was on a Southwest flight; it was the beginning of a long day, so when the flight attendant came by taking drink requests, coffee was in order.

Now, I have to admit that airline coffee’s gotten better, overall, over the last few years. But creamers haven’t. So when Carol asked me if I wanted ‘cream’ I plaintively asked, “Do you have milk?”

“No,” she replied, “we have those little creamers.”

Call me a snob, but my problem with those things is, I don’t care for dairy substitutes with a dozen or more ingredients including mold inhibitors and partially hydrogenated oils.

When the flight attendant saw the look on my face, she leaned in conspiratorially and said, “I have some of my own half-and-half in the galley. I’ll bring you some of that.”

And a few minutes later when she returned with my coffee, she also had a cup with an inch of creamer that had once actually been inside a cow.

I was reminded once again that front line staff are always in a position to create an incredible brand experience, if they’re given the freedom to creatively respond to customer desires.

From ‘Build a Brand Like Trader Joe’s’

From ‘Build a Brand Like Trader Joe’s’

The fact that Southwest didn’t have a little carton of milk or half-and-half in the service cart – that they instead carry something better called ‘whitener’ than ‘cream’ was, admittedly, a small problem for me. But it wasn’t something I took personally.

The thing is, when Carol brought me a bit of half-and-half from her personal stash, that was personal. It was a moment when a front-line customer-service staffer made a personal connection, and showed she cared.

I will probably never get on a Southwest flight again without thinking, at least for a moment, about the time a flight attendant improved day just that little bit, by doing something just for me.

Coffee Cup.JPG

Barnes & Noble needs a strategy for survival in the age of Amazon

It’s almost hard to remember, these days, that Amazon started out as an online bookstore. Unless you run bricks-and-mortar bookstore. In that case, it’s impossible to ignore the fact that Amazon accounts for about half of all books sold in the United States.

Over the last ten years, while hundreds of independent bookstores have opened and flourished, Barnes & Noble has closed about 1/5 of its locations. Book publishers know that while the behemoth struggles, it is still crucial to building visibilit…

Over the last ten years, while hundreds of independent bookstores have opened and flourished, Barnes & Noble has closed about 1/5 of its locations. Book publishers know that while the behemoth struggles, it is still crucial to building visibility for new titles.

The New York Times recently ran a story about Barnes & Noble, the other behemoth in the U.S. bookselling market. That company is now back under the day-to-day control of its 77 year-old founder, Leonard Riggio.

Riggio originally purchased one Barnes & Noble bookstore in New York City, and grew it to a 700+store chain. Ironically, he took B&N public within a few months of the Jeff Bezos launching Amazon, in 1994.

Over the next decade into the mid-2000s, nearly half of all U.S. bookstores closed. But then a strange thing happened: Small, independent bookstores stopped closing and shrinking. Now, quality independent shops are flourishing on the strength of local relevance and curated selection. 

The same can not be said of Barnes & Noble, which many observers feel has lost its way. So the question is, Can Barnes & Noble scale the same techniques used by independent booksellers to successfully compete against Amazon?

The answer: Yes. And the model is Trader Joe’s, which succeeded in building fantastic brand loyalty by hiring the right customer service staff, encouraging customer interaction, and empowering staff to create great customer experiences. In ‘Build a Brand Like Trader Joe’s’ (yes, available at Amazon!) I point out that TJ’s hires for attitude and then trains for aptitude. If you’re a cheerful extrovert, TJ’s doesn’t care whether or not you can work a cash register or quickly bag groceries.

The same approach would work for Barnes & Noble, if they’d only try it. Imagine a well-staffed Barnes & Noble store with literate, helpful employees. “You’re looking for ___? Let me show you where that is." Then, as the staffer walked to the right stack with the customer, he or she'd add, "You know if you like that author, you should try reading ___?”

The real beauty of this strategy is, can you imagine a more under-utilized resource than recent college grads with literature and other humanities degrees?

Toyota Canada and the Traffic Injury Research Foundations ask the wrong people the wrong questions

To read the entire report, click here.

To read the entire report, click here.

The Toyota Canada Foundation recently funded a project by the Canada's Traffic Injury Research Foundation, to research older drivers' attitudes towards "limited, self-driving, semi-automated vehicles (LSDVs)". Although TIRF's final report never defines an LSDV, my reading of the report suggests that the survey is about SAE Level 3 automation. That means that they conducted a survey about a whole category of vehicle automation that most experts now feel should not be put on the market.

The problem with this kind of partial automation is, as the SAE notes in its own definition of Level 3 Automation, that "The driver must be ready to take control of the vehicle at all times with notice". As recent examples including high profile Tesla 'Autopilot' and Uber fatalities show, one thing human drivers are terrible at is that "take control" assignment. We're OK at maintaining control, but we suck at fiddling with the temperature control, checking our Facebook status, putting on lipstick and then, suddenly, grabbing the wheel when our 'autopilot' suddenly can't handle some urgent traffic situation.

And, let's be honest, that's not the kind of thing older drivers can possibly be expected to do any better than young ones.

Don't get me wrong: I'm a big proponent of automated vehicles. I'm quite sure that lower levels of automation will be especially appreciated by, and useful for, older drivers. When fully autonomous vehicles are available, senior mobility and quality of life will be measurably improved.

This survey, which was pretty extensively picked up and reported upon, however, adds no meaningful insight. In addition to asking questions on the wrong topic, by focusing on a degree of partial automation that few experts now feel should even be attempted, it asks the wrong questions anyway. Seniors have, it turns out, pretty much the very same concerns younger drivers have. But like most such surveys this one pretends that drivers will step out of their current cars and into vehicles with far higher levels of automation, with no acclimation process at all.

That's not how life works. Later adopters will see self-driving cars on TV, get rides in self-driving cars, know people with self-driving cars, and have many opportunities to form opinions about such vehicles before they consider buying one, or riding in one on their own.

BBDO’s ‘Love Notes’ spot for Humana nails it

The health care category rarely comes in for approval here @BrandROI, but Humana caught my attention the other day at the gym, when I looked up to see a commercial that begins with an older guy jogging–but in a mysterious way, marked by a lot of sudden and inexplicable changes of direction.

The denouement comes when we realize that the old guy’s been using something like Under Armor’s MapMyRun app, and has been drawing a picture for his wife.

One proof that this is a great ad is that when I mentioned it to my wife while we were sitting on an airplane, the young guy in the seat beside her piped up, “Yeah, that was a good ad.” That Millennial liked it because the mystery of what, exactly, the old jogger was going caught his attention.

The reason I liked it was that it was a strikingly different (and positive) portrayal of two older consumers. The jogger wasn’t just in shape, he was also portrayed as tech savvy and creative, and still obviously in love with his wife.

Who gets the extra bonus point for not casting 50-somethings as 60- or 70-somethings? Did that come from BBDO? Production Company Superprime’s Molloy Brothers who are credited with directing the spot? Or even someone at Humana?

Enquiring minds would like to know more about this commercial, so Revolutionary Old Idea emailed Liz Hemmer, BBDO New York’s media relations maven, in the hopes of interviewing the team that produced this excellent spot. I hope BBDO gets back me. In the meantime, watch and learn how to market to mature consumers, without falling into ageist tropes and stereotypes.

I can’t believe it’s taken me six months to write about Campbell’s V8 ‘Nutrition Competition’ spots

This actor's wrinkles made me think, "Cool! A spot that presents a savvy, attractive woman, without trying to mask the fact that she's at least 50. But on repeated viewings, I realized Campbell's V8 commercial was guilty of reverse ageism.

This actor's wrinkles made me think, "Cool! A spot that presents a savvy, attractive woman, without trying to mask the fact that she's at least 50. But on repeated viewings, I realized Campbell's V8 commercial was guilty of reverse ageism.

Any ad industry types who are over 50 remember the classic “I could’ve had a V8!” commercials that Campbell’s aired beginning in the 1970s.

That’s a tough act to follow if you’re an ad creative, but I can’t believe how much material there is for me to write about in the ‘Nutrition Competition’ spots Campbell’s released last winter.

The first thing that leapt out at me, about both spots (there’s one directed at men and one at women) is that the trim and attractive V8-drinking protagonists are both well into their 50s, and they’re competing against much younger rivals who are all caricatures.

In the men's version of the spot, a trim Baby Boomer beats two cartoonish bodybuilders.

In the men's version of the spot, a trim Baby Boomer beats two cartoonish bodybuilders.

In the female version of the spot, a 50-ish woman (cheered on by two friends who appear to be 30- and 40-something) competes against a Millennial and her friend. The basic premise is straightforward; it’s a race to see who can consume two servings of veggies first. When the announcer says, ‘Go’ the older woman opens a bottle of V8 and chugs it. Meanwhile the Millennial phones in a fancy made-to-order juice… only to be interrupted by the confetti cannon that indicates the competition’s over.

The spot closes with a close-up of the smiling winner—a beautiful woman no doubt, but they’re not trying to hide her crow’s feet.

That’s what first captured my attention about the spot. How refreshing, I thought, that first, Campbell’s cast a mature actor and second, they definitely didn’t retouch out those wrinkles.

But when I sought out the ad and watched it a few more times, and did a little research into who the actors were, I realized there’s way, way more to write about.

It’s clear that Campbell’s has done the math and realizes that the average age of a V8 consumer is 60-plus. So of course they cast a mature woman as the winner of the Nutrition Competition. What’s interesting to me, however, is the way they’ve cast and portrayed the loser(s).

Campbell’s didn’t hold back, either. That Millennial brunette is Christina Masterson (better known as Emma, from Power Rangers Megaforce.) As the competition begins, she and her friend are smugly on their phones, dialing up ‘Juice Universe’, but before they get around to ordering their rutabaga smoothie, that woman who’s their mom’s age has already kicked their butts.

The spot’s worthy of a frame-by-frame analysis but I’ll focus on this one-second glance from Masterson, in which she looks over at her older rival and nearly rolls her eyes, as if to say, This is gonna’ be so easy—but it communicates so, so much mor…

The spot’s worthy of a frame-by-frame analysis but I’ll focus on this one-second glance from Masterson, in which she looks over at her older rival and nearly rolls her eyes, as if to say, This is gonna’ be so easy—but it communicates so, so much more. Those older women don’t even have their phones out; they’re so out of touch.

In a marvelous bit of writing, direction, and acting, one look from the Millennials says, We’re young, we’re with it, we’re sexy, and you’re… well you’re just not. But even in 15 seconds there’s time for a second plot point and reversal, when the Millennials are reduced to pathetically complaining, “That’s not fair!”

After spending a decade railing against ad industry ageism, I was instinctively drawn to a spot in which a beautiful mature woman (she's on the cusp of Gen-X and the Baby Boom) wins out over the conventionally hot Millennial. But things got even more interesting when I tried to determine the actual age of Angela Nicholas, the actor who Campbell’s cast as their 50-something female protagonist.

I still can't pinpoint her age. But Googling her name quickly established that she was the Penthouse Pet of the Month in August, 1985. Even if Bob Guccione shot her the moment she turned 18, she’s now over 50. But wait, there's more: As Angela Davies, she went on to have a career in 1990s soft porn (NSFW link) which certainly hasn’t hurt her when it comes to being cast in TV commercials—she’s appeared in spots for Kay Jewelers, Del Webb, and Hunt’s (dinner sauces) among other national brands.

If anything, Angela Nicholas’ background makes Christina Masterson’s dismissive glance even more tragic. Knowing what we know about Angela it’s, like, No, you’re not hotter than she is, either; you’re just young and stupid.

That dismissive glance from the Millennial girl is all the more pathetic when you consider the history of the older woman. Sure the Millennials are  young and hot now, but they'll never be photographed-by-Bob-Guccione-himself hot.

That dismissive glance from the Millennial girl is all the more pathetic when you consider the history of the older woman. Sure the Millennials are  young and hot now, but they'll never be photographed-by-Bob-Guccione-himself hot.

All that’s kind of fun to write about. I can’t blame Campbell’s for wanting to create a spot in which a Gen-X/Boomer protagonist wins out over Millennials. And I love that they’ve cast the beautiful Ms. Nicholas—an actor with a backstory that makes her even sexier.

But I’m in the unfamiliar position of criticizing these commercials for their reverse ageism

I’m sure V8 consumers skew older. But why go out of your way to antagonize younger consumers? Eventually, the brand will need to attract new customers. There had to be some way to have the mature consumers win without it coming at the expense of typecasting the younger ones as self-obsessed dimwits.

Maybe it’s time for the kids to realize, “I could’ve had a V8!”

 

50 over fifty: Hampton Fancher resurrects his screenwriting career, just shy of 80, with ‘Blade Runner 2049’

F. Scott Fitzgerald is often (mis)quoted as having written, “There are no second acts in American lives.” What he really wrote was more along the lines of, “I used to think there were no second acts, but...”

Hampton Fancher, who shares a screenwriting credit and has the sole story credit on ‘Blade Runner 2049’ doesn’t just prove there are second acts, but third and fourth ones. He’s been a professional flamenco dancer in Spain, a successful actor in TV westerns, and had a sparse but notable screenwriting career in the late ’70s, which included adapting Philip K. Dick’s ‘Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?” into the iconic sci-fi classic, ‘Blade Runner’.

He had a falling out with director Ridley Scott, however, and nearly had his name removed from the original film’s credits. That didn’t do his career much good; from the late ’70s until he was in his 70s, the phone hardly rang. But when it finally did, in 2012, it was Ridley Scott

Scott, who also directed the recent ’Runner reboot is another near-octogenarian.

Fancher spent much of the time between the two Blade Runner movies teaching screenwriting. He’s the subject of a documentary film called ‘Escapes’, although at the rate he’s going, that too may spin off a sequel.

Fancher says that he’s got a few more finished screenplays. “Since they’re knocking on the door again, maybe I’ll open it.”

Daily Factoid: Japan’s economic growth offers hope for aging developed nations

Are a large percentage of older consumers a drag on the economy? Or are the people who say that just dumbbells? 

Are a large percentage of older consumers a drag on the economy? Or are the people who say that just dumbbells? 

Here at ROI, we pay particular attention to economic news coming out of Japan, because that country is sort of the canary in the aging-population coal mine. So, it’s somewhat heartening to read that Japan recently posted its sixth consecutive quarter of economic growth. The results of the most recently available quarter correspond to an impressive annualized growth rate of 4%.

According to the CIA Factbook, Japan’s population has the second-highest median age, at 46.9, of any country. Only Monaco’s is higher, and Monaco’s population is heavily skewed because it’s a retirement haven. Germany has nearly the same median age, but Japan has a much higher percentage of senior citizens: According to WorldAtlas.com, 26.3% of Japan’s population is over 65.

It may not be as bad as all that. But we have to wonder whether the idea that aging consumers are inherently a drag on the economy is a product of ageism, or a cause of it?

It may not be as bad as all that. But we have to wonder whether the idea that aging consumers are inherently a drag on the economy is a product of ageism, or a cause of it?

We regularly encounter cassandras decrying the impact of aging consumers on the U.S. (and Canadian, and European) economies. But Japan’s aged population has apparently not doomed it to permanent recession. According to Bloomberg and the New York Times, Japan’s recent growth was driven by increased domestic spending, and matched by a significant increase in business investment. That’s good news. Japan’s economic managers would now like to see an uptick in inflation, hopefully caused by increased wages.

Japan’s economy’s improvement probably should be credited to a large public spending program, and the country’s very large public debt probably should not be glossed over. That’s another reason Japan would benefit from increased inflation – as inflation effectively lowers the interest rate on sovereign debt.

The people who worry about the effects of an aging population here in North America really have nothing to complain about. The median age of the U.S. is a sprightly 37.8 years, and it will likely never reach Japan’s or Germany’s current levels. [Pew…

The people who worry about the effects of an aging population here in North America really have nothing to complain about. The median age of the U.S. is a sprightly 37.8 years, and it will likely never reach Japan’s or Germany’s current levels. [Pew projects the U.S. median age will reach 42.2 in 2065.]

Amazon’s purchase of Whole Foods may deliver increased independence for seniors

If you just heard a shriek of terror off in the distance, it may well have been conventional grocery store owners reacting to news that Amazon’s just purchased Whole Foods.

The $42-per-share, $13+B deal places a large premium on Whole Foods and certainly suggests that Amazon’s ‘Fresh’ experiment whetted the online retailer’s appetite in the grocery sector. I’ve seen estimates that Amazon sold about $350M worth of groceries last year. That’s not chicken feed, but it’s peanuts compared to Whole Foods’ sales, in the $15B range.

OK, I’ll try to rein in the food puns. But seriously…

So far, U.S. grocery shoppers have been a little resistant to buying groceries online—this is especially true when it comes to produce, or dairy and other things that need to be kept cool. By contrast, in Great Britain, about half of all grocery shoppers have tried buying groceries online, and over 10% of them report doing virtually all of their shopping online.

Amazon’s acquisition of Whole Foods suggests that it feels Americans can be convinced of something similar. (At the very least, Amazon certainly overpaid, if one considers this to be only or even mainly a bricks-and-mortar proposition; Whole Foods’ stock’s been under pressure for the last few years.)

One thing Amazon may have considered is that the aging population plays to the strengths of the online grocery model.

Seniors are less enthusiastic about driving, navigating huge grocery store parking lots, and trekking around with heavy bags of groceries. I know from the experience of people in my own family that shopping online and having groceries delivered can be critical to independent living.

Although many online retailers are obsessed with younger consumers who they perceive as ‘digital natives’, the truth is that mature consumers spend more online than millennials. And as the vast majority of Baby Boomers plan to age in place, it seems inevitable that the grocery business will catch up to other retail sectors in terms of the percentage of sales that come from online purchase and delivery.

Is this Samsung Galaxy VR ad ageist, racist, or neither?

It's rare for me to watch a TV spot in which an older consumer's cast to type, and still be unable to decide how I feel about it. But that's the case with a recent Samsung Galaxy S7 VR ad created (I think) by 72 and Sunny.

I could not find an easily embeddable version of this ad but you can watch it here

I could not find an easily embeddable version of this ad but you can watch it here

In the spot, a group of teenagers seem to be trying the Gear VR headset for the first time. An older consumer asks what they're doing, and asks to try the headset. The kids immediately let him try, giving the spot a friendly, intergenerational vibe.

But of course the old guy's typecast as the one who doesn't know from VR gear. And then there's his accent; he's from somewhere else. I suppose the spot can't technically be racist--after all the group of kids is diverse--but is there's a whiff of culture-ism; people from somewhere else can't be as with it as we are.

At one point, the kids literally laugh at the old man, but the spot manages to create the impression they're laughing with him, not at him.

At one point, the kids literally laugh at the old man, but the spot manages to create the impression they're laughing with him, not at him.

I would have loved it if the old man had been showing his Gear VR system to the woman on the park bench, and had the kids come up and ask what it was, and have them try it. I doubt that idea or anything like it was pitched in the agency brainstorming session, but on balance I feel this ad's generally warm-hearted vibe and strong execution manage to (just) skirt ageism.

Seniors in college... debt

The amount of student loan debt held by senior citizens has increased by over 500% over the last decade. Perhaps surprisingly, only about 20% of that debt was accumulated by their children.

What age cohort has the highest percentage of their student loans in default? People over 75

What age cohort has the highest percentage of their student loans in default? People over 75

Nearly $20B is owed by seniors in about 750,000 households. I.E., the average debt load is north of $20k per indebted household. Expanding the definition of mature student loan debtors to those over 50 increases their share of total debt to over 15%.

That is, admittedly, a small percentage of total student loan debt, but seniors’ share of total debt is growing and, alarmingly, people over 75 have very high rates of default.

It’s hard to tease the average length of these loans out of the available stats. A lot of this debt was accumulated by baby boomers who borrowed money for college way back in the ‘70s and haven’t paid it back. The problem is, if seniors retire before they retire their federal student loan debts, The Man can garnish up to 15% of Social Security payments!

Many seniors’ student loans were taken out more recently, by people who were middle aged when they were laid off ten or fifteen years ago. They followed accepted wisdom and retrained. The problem is that people returning to school in the early 2000s accumulated far larger debts than they did the first time around—because tuition and other educational costs have dramatically outpaced inflation since their first rodeo.

Statistically speaking, seniors are obviously less likely than millennials to be hobbled by student loan debt, but if trends continue, there will soon be 1,000,000 million senior households in just that situation.

That’s just another illustration of this truth: Whenever you think, “That’s a young person’s problem,” or “That only applies to young people,” or “Only kids are concerned with…” you’re almost certainly wrong. That thing—whatever it is—is almost certainly relevant to quite a few seniors, too.

 

 

You may be tired of hearing Boomers say that things are getting worse, but they are. For Millennials.

Baby Boomers, many of whom are now senior citizens, are often mocked for endlessly complaining that "The world's going to hell in a handbasket". Well, a recent op-ed piece in the New York Times by David Leonhardt used data gathered by a Stanford University economist (Raj Chetty) to prove that things are getting worse... for Millennials.

The implication of this graph is that about half of all children born in 1980 were born to the lowest 30% of income-earners.

The implication of this graph is that about half of all children born in 1980 were born to the lowest 30% of income-earners.

Chetty used millions of anonymized federal income tax records, dating back to 1940, to calculate a sort of 'American Dream' factor: That is, the odds American children—once they'd matured to age 30—would earn more than their parents had earned at that age. 

What he learned was that for the first few decades after WWII, most Americans grew up to become wealthier adults than their parents had been at that age. (And most of the 30-somethings who didn't earn more than their parents had at that age weren't hurting anyway; they were usually 1%ers who were still making well above-average incomes.)

Although the probability of growing up to earn more than your parents gradually decreased from the 1940s through the '70s, the American Dream of increasing prosperity held true for most Baby Boomers and a lot of Gen Xers.

But children of the 1980s—Millennials—can't expect to earn more than their parents and Chetty's data gives no real hope that future generations should expect to earn more, either.

This is one more nail in the coffin of the oldest marketing truism: That you should direct your ads at younger consumers, because they're not only the ones who'll live to buy your brand longer, they're the ones who are going to have more money to spend in the future.

The young consumers of the future seem likely to be even more cash strapped than the young consumers of today. But go ahead; just keep alienating us mature consumers—the ones with all the money.

Apple’s ‘Dive’ ad for iPhone is a tacit admission that the ad industry’s ageist, but we dig it anyway

Apple picked a great moment – in the nail-biting seventh game of the World Series – to unveil a 60-second spot for the iPhone 7 starring a still-anonymous senior citizen.

The :60 (which cost $1M to broadcast once in the World Series) was created by TBWA, and shot at the spectacular aquatic facility built for the Barcelona Olympics. But the decision to cast a senior citizen as a star – in a spot where he’d be wearing a bathing suit, no less – was even more striking than the cost of air time or the setting.

I asked TBWA about the spot, but the agency has not yet replied to my enquiries. The action begins at poolside, where a 60-something bather is lounging beside a 20-something woman. The older man turns up the volume on his iPhone speakers (demonstrating the impressive volume the unit can put out) and lays it carelessly in a small puddle (demonstrating, I presume, water-resistance).

Then the dude makes the long climb to the 10-meter platform, striding imperiously past another older gentleman; handing his sunglasses to a baffled kid; not deigning to even glance at a young guy with a man-bun. He pauses briefly at the edge of the platform. It’s not clear whether this is all for that (much) younger woman’s benefit or not.

He launches himself from the platform and for a moment, it seems we’re about to see an epic belly flop. But at the last moment, he snaps into a vertical entry and rips a pretty good dive.

“What the heck did I just see?” I wondered, when this spot appeared in Game 7?

The ad has a kind of Wes Anderson/ironic feel, and if you think about it the old diver’s a bit of douche, turning the speakers up like that. But he is clearly the hero of both the ad and his own life.

On the face of it, it could be an ad specifically directed at older male consumers. That’s not a crazy assumption. According to Slice Intelligence, men outspend women, and men over 65 are the top spenders (per capita).

That said, seniors account for less than 25% of Apple’s device business. So it’s far more likely that TBWA’s casting choice was driven by the desire to create a spot that stands out. In that sense, ironically, the diver is striking because he is so unexpected as a character. He’s unexpected because the ad industry is otherwise so ageist.

So where does this leave us here at Re:? Well, the spot currently has a 99.3% positive rating on iSpot.tv which is outstanding, and it’s been viewed well over a million additional times on YouTube. I’d have to say it’s a win for TBWA and Apple, and give it an ‘Eh!’ grade, because even if the senior’s being exploited, he’s being exploited in a way that other senior consumers – especially men – are gonna’ like.